Wednesday, March 12, 2008

The Moment That I Realized It

As you may know, a number of months back I wrote a guest blog for the popular website Performancing.com.

One article I wrote was about a pillar of electronic PR... what we call "relevance". Which loosely means that your message connects with the largest possible segment of the media's audience.
Its a gross oversimplification but we can talk about it another time.

Anyway, after Reading through some of the user comments on this article, it dawned on me ... that what I have been so successful at for all of these years in the broadcast news industry relies on the very same principle of "relevance" as does search engine marketing.

Applying this concept into the Google AdWords realm has enabled our firm to run pay per click campaigns with phenomenal results. This morning, for example, as I checked on our campaigns, I noted that one particular key phrase in an active campaign for a nutrition company has a click through rate of 50 percent!

Never did we expect that kind of response. The response has been so strong that we typically reach our daily spending limits usually before 10AM.


Proving that whether the media is old or new, Relevance remains the key to effective marketing communication.

Thursday, January 3, 2008

Good Publicity vs. Bad Publicity (Guess Which Wins)

Happy New Year! The first lesson of 2008 is to remember old lessons. Recently, we were hired by an agency working for the big music industry trade group to distribute and promote what really amounted to a PSA. Tips on how consumers can spot and avoid buying counterfeit cd’s.

Media receptivity was unusually warm, but the story fell flat. We’ve seen just 3 airings to date on local market broadcast outlets.

We “leaked” the video online to LiveLeak (http://tinyurl.com/27uqza) and generated some great coverage on top blogs, including www.arstechnica.com and www.consumerist.com for the client.

But we consider the campaign a failure. (Can’t win them all)

Now, compare this to the coverage the client got for filing suit against an individual who ripped songs from cd’s he bought. In less than one week, we have seen over 150 airings.

Why?

It’s anyone’s guess. My opinion is that the media loves to do negative, damning stories wherever possible, and in this case, the client is an easy target.

When they try to educate people, rather than sue, they get no love from the media. They sue and it’s all over the news.

Go figure.